Al Gore Can Beat Hillary – NewsMax.com
Posted by: Hillary Clinton - Google News
Posted in: Hillary Clinton
Posted on: October 13 , 2007 - 9:23 am
 Boston Globe | Al Gore Can Beat Hillary NewsMax.com, FL - If the bumper sticker of ’92 and ’96 (Clinton-Gore) divides, and we find Gore running against Hillary Clinton, Al Gore could not only beat the former First ... 'Goracle' of climate change Gore urged to run for US presidency again Nobel Prize likely to increase pressure on Gore to run |
11 Responses to “Al Gore Can Beat Hillary – NewsMax.com”
Ron Paul is the only one on the Republican side that could defeat Shillary. But we all the know the left/right paradigm is completely false and controlled by the world elite (also known as the Bilderberg Group). Bush/Clinton/Bush/Clinton/Bush/Clinton…Nothing to see here, move along.
November 27th, 2007 at November 27 , 2007 - 12:17 pmGore has alot of supporters so maybe he could win the nomination over Senator Clinton. There’s just one problem-he isn’t running and Hillary is.
January 13th, 2008 at January 13 , 2008 - 6:11 amDear Hillary.
Last evening 60 Minutes ran a tragic piece on how women are being raped in the Congo. One out of every 10 women– this is beyond human endurance and we, as women, have to stand up and speak out against it as soon as it touches our conciousness. If we don’t I see all us women as worth less. So please Hillary while you have the megaphone say something address the problem. Please don’t let it slide by.
January 14th, 2008 at January 14 , 2008 - 11:11 amSincerely
Patricia
I only have a few questions that people need to look into and if candidates or their followers can answer them or address them that would be great.
What are the candidates views on Bilderberg?
What are the candidates views on the New World Order?
Does the candidate have any plans on reinvestigating 9/11 or the explosions heard at ground level?
If any could answer these questions truthfully then I would feel comfortable voting for them.
I just saw the movie by Alex Jones called ENDGAME and it has completely changed my views on this election. You can view it on youtube. I urge anyone who votes to at least view a few sections of it before you vote.
February 2nd, 2008 at February 02 , 2008 - 8:33 amhmmm hilary is an agent of change alright she plans on ruining this country with her red commie liberal bs and will turn this country into the dark ages. as for the people who say im sexist for not wanting mrs clinton to be president. you all can rot in hell because im not sexist because i would have vote for condoleezza rice if she ran for president. anyone who would vote for either one of these bowls of bull crap democrats are here by now declared retarded
February 2nd, 2008 at February 02 , 2008 - 11:08 pmoh and to stay on topic al gore is as smart as a rock. he couldnt beat a rock if it was running for president. global warming….. are you serious? omg what a joke!
February 3rd, 2008 at February 03 , 2008 - 1:20 ami know these comments wont make it because you are all libs in the site and want to keep us right minded people out.
February 3rd, 2008 at February 03 , 2008 - 1:21 amAnyone can beat Hillary!
I support Barack Obama for reasons extending beyond “experience†and beyond “idealism†and beyond the minutiae details regarding whether a program will work exactly as intended.
Yes, we need someone capable, but this man has gone up against the establishment time and time again and has succeeded. Who among us even thought he had a minimul chance of getting to the point he has gotten too against Senator Hillary Clinton? Yes, we may have hoped he would get this far, but would anyone have guessed his success? Certainly, the Clintons did not. The inevitable candidate is not so inevitable, and that just can’t happen. Or can it?
Barack Obama has surrounded himself with smart people. He has faced a political machine that has been 20+ years in the making. Senator Obama has made effective decisions that have placed him within reach of the “clear frontrunner.†He has put together an organization and a machine that is effective beyond anyone’s imagination. “Lack of experience†is an extremely weak argument; but it is the Clintons strongest argument. I suggest that there is a hole in this bucket.
A president is not a “manager.†He/She is a leader. The President is someone who inspires people and a nation to be better, to do better, and knows how to motivate those around him/her to give 100% all the time. A President is someone who can get the job done utilizing the talent around him/her and knows when he/she is out of their comfort zone and range of ability and not afraid to say so. At the same time smart enough to know how to get the best minds possible on the problem, and from different perspectives, and then helping them, help him, make the best possible decisions. Nobody… and I mean nobody, has all the answers. So who would you think has the courage, the conviction, the humility to accept that he/she does not know all the answers, but will strive diligently to find those who do? If your response is Hillary I would respectfully suggest that you are not being honest with yourself. If she were capable of that, I would not be here, writing this missive and President Clinton II would be well on her way to the Whitehouse.
Hillary can’t motivate half the democratic party, let alone independents and moderate republicans. In all candor I would vote for John McCain or Mike Huckabee before casting a vote for Senator Clinton, not out of spite but because I believe in my heart that these gentlemen represent the change I am looking for much more than Hillary Clinton.
If you look, point by point on the issues… the difference between Barack and Hillary are non-existent, I lean towards Barack relative to the ability to get this stuff done, but I respect those who feel Hillary is just as capable. So I’m left with deciding based upon who inspires me, who makes me want to do more, who makes me and my country want to be more. Who thinks in terms of “how do we do this?†not “can we do this?â€
From my chair Hillary sells us, we Americans short. She says HOPE is not enough. Hope is NOT enough, but it is an essential, critical first ingredient and without it…the cake will never rise.
Please consider voting for Barack Obama. Find out more about Barack’s and Hillary Clintons positions at:
Barack Obama: http://www.barackobama.com/issues/
Hillary Clinton: http://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/
With respect to all,
February 3rd, 2008 at February 03 , 2008 - 3:49 amDavid Pippin, Santa Rosa, CA
Anyone can beat Hillary!
I support Barack Obama for reasons extending beyond “experience†and beyond “idealism†and beyond the minutiae details regarding whether a program will work exactly as intended.
Yes, we need someone capable, but this man has gone up against the establishment time and time again and has succeeded. Who among us even thought he had a minimul chance of getting to the point he has gotten too against Senator Hillary Clinton? Yes, we may have hoped he would get this far, but would anyone have guessed his success? Certainly, the Clintons did not. The inevitable candidate is not so inevitable, and that just can’t happen. Or can it?
Barack Obama has surrounded himself with smart people. He has faced a political machine that has been 20+ years in the making. Senator Obama has made effective decisions that have placed him within reach of the “clear frontrunner.†He has put together an organization and a machine that is effective beyond anyone’s imagination. “Lack of experience†is an extremely weak argument; but it is the Clintons strongest argument. I suggest that there is a hole in this bucket.
A president is not a “manager.†He/She is a leader. The President is someone who inspires people and a nation to be better, to do better, and knows how to motivate those around him/her to give 100% all the time. A President is someone who can get the job done utilizing the talent around him/her and knows when he/she is out of their comfort zone and range of ability and not afraid to say so. At the same time smart enough to know how to get the best minds possible on the problem, and from different perspectives, and then helping them, help him, make the best possible decisions. Nobody… and I mean nobody, has all the answers. So who would you think has the courage, the conviction, the humility to accept that he/she does not know all the answers, but will strive diligently to find those who do? If your response is Hillary I would respectfully suggest that you are not being honest with yourself. If she were capable of that, I would not be here, writing this missive and President Clinton II would be well on her way to the Whitehouse.
Hillary can’t motivate half the democratic party, let alone independents and moderate republicans. In all candor I would vote for John McCain or Mike Huckabee before casting a vote for Senator Clinton, not out of spite but because I believe in my heart that these gentlemen represent the change I am looking for much more than Hillary Clinton.
If you look, point by point on the issues… the difference between Barack and Hillary are non-existent, I lean towards Barack relative to the ability to get this stuff done, but I respect those who feel Hillary is just as capable. So I’m left with deciding based upon who inspires me, who makes me want to do more, who makes me and my country want to be more. Who thinks in terms of “how do we do this?†not “can we do this?â€
From my chair Hillary sells us, we Americans short. She says HOPE is not enough. Hope is NOT enough, but it is an essential, critical first ingredient and without it…the cake will never rise.
Please consider voting for Barack Obama. Find out more about Barack’s and Hillary Clintons positions at:
Barack Obama: http://www.barackobama.com/issues/
Hillary Clinton: http://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/
With respect to all,
February 3rd, 2008 at February 03 , 2008 - 3:49 amDavid Pippin, Santa Rosa, CA
The following is from a lot of blogs out there. Does anyone know about the $20 million that Hillary got from some Amir guy? I just heard Dick Morris mention that on the O’Reilly show. Is this another shady deal?
Hillary Clinton has been telling America that she is the most qualified candidate for president based on her ‘record,’ which she says includes her eight years in the White House as First Lady – or ‘co-president’ – and her seven years in the Senate. Here is a reminder of what that record includes: – As First Lady, Hillary assumed authority over Health Care Reform, a process that cost the taxpayers over $13 million. She told both Bill Bradley and Patrick Moynihan, key votes needed to pass her legislation, that she would ‘demonize’ anyone who opposed it. But it was opposed; she couldn’t even get it to a vote in a Congress controlled by her own party. (And in the next election, her party lost control of both the House and Senate.) – Hillary assumed authority over selecting a female Attorney General. Her first two recommendations, Zoe Baird and Kimba Wood, were forced to withdraw their names from consideration. She then chose Janet Reno. Janet Reno has since been described by Bill himself as ‘my worst mistake.’ – Hillary recommended Lani Guanier for head of the Civil Rights Commission. When Guanier’s radical views became known, her name had to be withdrawn. – Hillary recommended her former law partners, Web Hubbell, Vince Foster, and William Kennedy for positions in the Justice Department, White House staff, and the Treasury, respectively. Hubbell was later imprisoned, Foster committed suicide, and Kennedy was forced to resign. – Hillary also recommended a close friend of the Clintons, Craig Livingstone, for the position of director of White House security. When Livingstone was investigated for the improper access of up to 900 FBI files of Clinton enemies (“Filegateâ€) and the widespread use of drugs by White House staff, both Hillary and her husband denied knowing him. FBI agent Dennis Sculimbrene confirmed in a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing in 1996, both the drug use and Hillary’s involvement in hiring Livingstone. After that, the FBI closed its White House Liaison Office, after serving seven presidents for over thirty years. – In order to open “slots†in the White House for her friends the Thomasons (to whom millions of dollars in travel contracts could be awarded), Hillary had the entire staff of the White House Travel Office fired; they were reported to the FBI for ‘gross mismanagement’ and their reputations ruined. After a thirty-month investigation, only one, Billy Dale, was charged with a crime – mixing personal money with White House funds when he cashed checks. The jury acquitted him in less than two hours. – Another of Hil lary’s assumed duties was directing the ‘bimbo eruption squad’ and scandal defense: —- She urged her husband not to settle the Paula Jones lawsuit. —- She refused to release the Whitewater documents, which led to the appointment of Ken Starr as Special Prosecutor. After $80 million dollars of taxpayer money was spent, Starr’s investigation led to Monica Lewinsky, which led to Bill lying about and later admitting his affairs. —- Then they had to settle with Paula Jones after all. —- And Bill lost his law license for lying to the grand jury —- And Bill was impeached by the House. —- And Hillary almost got herself indicted for perjury and obstruction of justice (she avoided it mostly because she repeated, ‘I do not recall,’ ‘I have no recollection,’ and ‘I don’t know’ 56 times under oath). – Hillary wrote ‘It Takes a Village,’ demonstrating her Socialist viewpoint. – Hill ary decided to seek election to the Senate in a state she had never lived in. Her husband pardoned FALN terrorists in order to get Latino support and the New Square Hassidim to get Jewish support. Hillary also had Bill pardon her brother’s clients, for a small fee, to get financial support. – Then Hillary left the White House, but later had to return $200,000 in White House furniture, china, and artwork she had stolen. – In the campaign for the Senate, Hillary played the ‘woman card’ by portraying her opponent (Lazio) as a bully picking on her. – Hillary’s husband further protected her by asking the National Archives to withhold from the public until 2012 many records of their time in the White House, including much of Hillary’s correspondence and her calendars. (There are ongoing lawsuits to force the release of those records.) – As the junior Senator from New York, Hillary has passed no major legislation. She has deferred to the senior Senator (Schumer) to tend to the needs of New Yorkers, even on the hot issue of medical problems of workers involved in the cleanup of Ground Zero after 9/11. – Hillary’s one notable vote; supporting the plan to invade Iraq, she has since disavowed. Quite a resume’. Sounds more like an organized crime family’s rap sheet.
February 6th, 2008 at February 06 , 2008 – 10:22 pm
February 6th, 2008 at February 06 , 2008 - 10:24 pmObama is an empty suit! Ask any of his “fans” what he has donein the past that can possibly assure them there will be “change” in the future. Nada. He is running on empty
February 22nd, 2008 at February 22 , 2008 - 8:28 am