<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Al Gore Can Beat Hillary &#8211; NewsMax.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogsforhillary.com/2007/10/13/al-gore-can-beat-hillary-newsmaxcom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogsforhillary.com/2007/10/13/al-gore-can-beat-hillary-newsmaxcom/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 13:17:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://blogsforhillary.com/2007/10/13/al-gore-can-beat-hillary-newsmaxcom/comment-page-1/#comment-8849</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 14:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description>Obama is an empty suit! Ask any of his &quot;fans&quot; what he has donein the past that can possibly assure them there will be &quot;change&quot; in the future. Nada. He is running on empty</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama is an empty suit! Ask any of his &#8220;fans&#8221; what he has donein the past that can possibly assure them there will be &#8220;change&#8221; in the future. Nada. He is running on empty</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: connie</title>
		<link>http://blogsforhillary.com/2007/10/13/al-gore-can-beat-hillary-newsmaxcom/comment-page-1/#comment-8561</link>
		<dc:creator>connie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 04:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description>The following is from a lot of blogs out there. Does anyone know about the $20 million that Hillary got from some Amir guy? I just heard Dick Morris mention that on the Oâ€™Reilly show. Is this another shady deal?
Hillary Clinton has been telling America that she is the most qualified candidate for president based on her â€˜record,â€™ which she says includes her eight years in the White House as First Lady - or â€˜co-presidentâ€™ - and her seven years in the Senate. Here is a reminder of what that record includes: - As First Lady, Hillary assumed authority over Health Care Reform, a process that cost the taxpayers over $13 million. She told both Bill Bradley and Patrick Moynihan, key votes needed to pass her legislation, that she would â€˜demonizeâ€™ anyone who opposed it. But it was opposed; she couldnâ€™t even get it to a vote in a Congress controlled by her own party. (And in the next election, her party lost control of both the House and Senate.) - Hillary assumed authority over selecting a female Attorney General. Her first two recommendations, Zoe Baird and Kimba Wood, were forced to withdraw their names from consideration. She then chose Janet Reno. Janet Reno has since been described by Bill himself as â€˜my worst mistake.â€™ - Hillary recommended Lani Guanier for head of the Civil Rights Commission. When Guanierâ€™s radical views became known, her name had to be withdrawn. - Hillary recommended her former law partners, Web Hubbell, Vince Foster, and William Kennedy for positions in the Justice Department, White House staff, and the Treasury, respectively. Hubbell was later imprisoned, Foster committed suicide, and Kennedy was forced to resign. - Hillary also recommended a close friend of the Clintons, Craig Livingstone, for the position of director of White House security. When Livingstone was investigated for the improper access of up to 900 FBI files of Clinton enemies (â€œFilegateâ€) and the widespread use of drugs by White House staff, both Hillary and her husband denied knowing him. FBI agent Dennis Sculimbrene confirmed in a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing in 1996, both the drug use and Hillaryâ€™s involvement in hiring Livingstone. After that, the FBI closed its White House Liaison Office, after serving seven presidents for over thirty years. - In order to open â€œslotsâ€ in the White House for her friends the Thomasons (to whom millions of dollars in travel contracts could be awarded), Hillary had the entire staff of the White House Travel Office fired; they were reported to the FBI for â€˜gross mismanagementâ€™ and their reputations ruined. After a thirty-month investigation, only one, Billy Dale, was charged with a crime - mixing personal money with White House funds when he cashed checks. The jury acquitted him in less than two hours. - Another of Hil laryâ€™s assumed duties was directing the â€˜bimbo eruption squadâ€™ and scandal defense: â€”- She urged her husband not to settle the Paula Jones lawsuit. â€”- She refused to release the Whitewater documents, which led to the appointment of Ken Starr as Special Prosecutor. After $80 million dollars of taxpayer money was spent, Starrâ€™s investigation led to Monica Lewinsky, which led to Bill lying about and later admitting his affairs. â€”- Then they had to settle with Paula Jones after all. â€”- And Bill lost his law license for lying to the grand jury â€”- And Bill was impeached by the House. â€”- And Hillary almost got herself indicted for perjury and obstruction of justice (she avoided it mostly because she repeated, â€˜I do not recall,â€™ â€˜I have no recollection,â€™ and â€˜I donâ€™t knowâ€™ 56 times under oath). - Hillary wrote â€˜It Takes a Village,â€™ demonstrating her Socialist viewpoint. - Hill ary decided to seek election to the Senate in a state she had never lived in. Her husband pardoned FALN terrorists in order to get Latino support and the New Square Hassidim to get Jewish support. Hillary also had Bill pardon her brotherâ€™s clients, for a small fee, to get financial support. - Then Hillary left the White House, but later had to return $200,000 in White House furniture, china, and artwork she had stolen. - In the campaign for the Senate, Hillary played the â€˜woman cardâ€™ by portraying her opponent (Lazio) as a bully picking on her. - Hillaryâ€™s husband further protected her by asking the National Archives to withhold from the public until 2012 many records of their time in the White House, including much of Hillaryâ€™s correspondence and her calendars. (There are ongoing lawsuits to force the release of those records.) - As the junior Senator from New York, Hillary has passed no major legislation. She has deferred to the senior Senator (Schumer) to tend to the needs of New Yorkers, even on the hot issue of medical problems of workers involved in the cleanup of Ground Zero after 9/11. - Hillaryâ€™s one notable vote; supporting the plan to invade Iraq, she has since disavowed. Quite a resumeâ€™. Sounds more like an organized crime familyâ€™s rap sheet.

February 6th, 2008 at February 06 , 2008 - 10:22 pm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The following is from a lot of blogs out there. Does anyone know about the $20 million that Hillary got from some Amir guy? I just heard Dick Morris mention that on the Oâ€™Reilly show. Is this another shady deal?<br />
Hillary Clinton has been telling America that she is the most qualified candidate for president based on her â€˜record,â€™ which she says includes her eight years in the White House as First Lady &#8211; or â€˜co-presidentâ€™ &#8211; and her seven years in the Senate. Here is a reminder of what that record includes: &#8211; As First Lady, Hillary assumed authority over Health Care Reform, a process that cost the taxpayers over $13 million. She told both Bill Bradley and Patrick Moynihan, key votes needed to pass her legislation, that she would â€˜demonizeâ€™ anyone who opposed it. But it was opposed; she couldnâ€™t even get it to a vote in a Congress controlled by her own party. (And in the next election, her party lost control of both the House and Senate.) &#8211; Hillary assumed authority over selecting a female Attorney General. Her first two recommendations, Zoe Baird and Kimba Wood, were forced to withdraw their names from consideration. She then chose Janet Reno. Janet Reno has since been described by Bill himself as â€˜my worst mistake.â€™ &#8211; Hillary recommended Lani Guanier for head of the Civil Rights Commission. When Guanierâ€™s radical views became known, her name had to be withdrawn. &#8211; Hillary recommended her former law partners, Web Hubbell, Vince Foster, and William Kennedy for positions in the Justice Department, White House staff, and the Treasury, respectively. Hubbell was later imprisoned, Foster committed suicide, and Kennedy was forced to resign. &#8211; Hillary also recommended a close friend of the Clintons, Craig Livingstone, for the position of director of White House security. When Livingstone was investigated for the improper access of up to 900 FBI files of Clinton enemies (â€œFilegateâ€) and the widespread use of drugs by White House staff, both Hillary and her husband denied knowing him. FBI agent Dennis Sculimbrene confirmed in a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing in 1996, both the drug use and Hillaryâ€™s involvement in hiring Livingstone. After that, the FBI closed its White House Liaison Office, after serving seven presidents for over thirty years. &#8211; In order to open â€œslotsâ€ in the White House for her friends the Thomasons (to whom millions of dollars in travel contracts could be awarded), Hillary had the entire staff of the White House Travel Office fired; they were reported to the FBI for â€˜gross mismanagementâ€™ and their reputations ruined. After a thirty-month investigation, only one, Billy Dale, was charged with a crime &#8211; mixing personal money with White House funds when he cashed checks. The jury acquitted him in less than two hours. &#8211; Another of Hil laryâ€™s assumed duties was directing the â€˜bimbo eruption squadâ€™ and scandal defense: â€”- She urged her husband not to settle the Paula Jones lawsuit. â€”- She refused to release the Whitewater documents, which led to the appointment of Ken Starr as Special Prosecutor. After $80 million dollars of taxpayer money was spent, Starrâ€™s investigation led to Monica Lewinsky, which led to Bill lying about and later admitting his affairs. â€”- Then they had to settle with Paula Jones after all. â€”- And Bill lost his law license for lying to the grand jury â€”- And Bill was impeached by the House. â€”- And Hillary almost got herself indicted for perjury and obstruction of justice (she avoided it mostly because she repeated, â€˜I do not recall,â€™ â€˜I have no recollection,â€™ and â€˜I donâ€™t knowâ€™ 56 times under oath). &#8211; Hillary wrote â€˜It Takes a Village,â€™ demonstrating her Socialist viewpoint. &#8211; Hill ary decided to seek election to the Senate in a state she had never lived in. Her husband pardoned FALN terrorists in order to get Latino support and the New Square Hassidim to get Jewish support. Hillary also had Bill pardon her brotherâ€™s clients, for a small fee, to get financial support. &#8211; Then Hillary left the White House, but later had to return $200,000 in White House furniture, china, and artwork she had stolen. &#8211; In the campaign for the Senate, Hillary played the â€˜woman cardâ€™ by portraying her opponent (Lazio) as a bully picking on her. &#8211; Hillaryâ€™s husband further protected her by asking the National Archives to withhold from the public until 2012 many records of their time in the White House, including much of Hillaryâ€™s correspondence and her calendars. (There are ongoing lawsuits to force the release of those records.) &#8211; As the junior Senator from New York, Hillary has passed no major legislation. She has deferred to the senior Senator (Schumer) to tend to the needs of New Yorkers, even on the hot issue of medical problems of workers involved in the cleanup of Ground Zero after 9/11. &#8211; Hillaryâ€™s one notable vote; supporting the plan to invade Iraq, she has since disavowed. Quite a resumeâ€™. Sounds more like an organized crime familyâ€™s rap sheet.</p>
<p>February 6th, 2008 at February 06 , 2008 &#8211; 10:22 pm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Pippin</title>
		<link>http://blogsforhillary.com/2007/10/13/al-gore-can-beat-hillary-newsmaxcom/comment-page-1/#comment-8365</link>
		<dc:creator>David Pippin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 09:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description>Anyone can beat Hillary!

I support Barack Obama for reasons extending beyond â€œexperienceâ€ and beyond â€œidealismâ€ and beyond the minutiae details regarding whether a program will work exactly as intended.  

Yes, we need someone capable, but this man has gone up against the establishment time and time again and has succeeded.  Who among us even thought he had a minimul chance of getting to the point he has gotten too against Senator Hillary Clinton?  Yes, we may have hoped he would get this far, but would anyone have guessed his success?  Certainly, the Clintons did not.  The inevitable candidate is not so inevitable, and that just canâ€™t happen.  Or can it?

Barack Obama has surrounded himself with smart people.  He has faced a political machine that has been 20+ years in the making.  Senator Obama has made effective decisions that have placed him within reach of the â€œclear frontrunner.â€  He has put together an organization and a machine that is effective beyond anyoneâ€™s imagination.  â€œLack of experienceâ€ is an extremely weak argument; but it is the Clintons strongest argument.  I suggest that there is a hole in this bucket.

A president is not a â€œmanager.â€  He/She is a leader.  The President is someone who inspires people and a nation to be better, to do better, and knows how to motivate those around him/her to give 100% all the time. A President is someone who can get the job done utilizing the talent around him/her and knows when he/she is out of their comfort zone and range of ability and not afraid to say so.  At the same time smart enough to know how to get the best minds possible on the problem, and from different perspectives, and then helping them, help him, make the best possible decisions.  Nobodyâ€¦ and I mean nobody, has all the answers.  So who would you think has the courage, the conviction, the humility to accept that he/she does not know all the answers, but will strive diligently to find those who do?  If your response is Hillary I would respectfully suggest that you are not being honest with yourself.  If she were capable of that, I would not be here, writing this missive and President Clinton II would be well on her way to the Whitehouse.

Hillary canâ€™t motivate half the democratic party, let alone independents and moderate republicans.  In all candor I would vote for John McCain or Mike Huckabee before casting a vote for Senator Clinton, not out of spite but because I believe in my heart that these gentlemen represent the change I am looking for much more than Hillary Clinton.

If you look, point by point on the issuesâ€¦ the difference between Barack and Hillary are non-existent, I lean towards Barack relative to the ability to get this stuff done, but I respect those who feel Hillary is just as capable.  So Iâ€™m left with deciding based upon who inspires me, who makes me want to do more, who makes me and my country want to be more.  Who thinks in terms of â€œhow do we do this?â€ not â€œcan we do this?â€  

From my chair Hillary sells us, we Americans short.  She says HOPE is not enough.  Hope is NOT enough, but it is an essential, critical first ingredient and without itâ€¦the  cake will never rise.

Please consider voting for Barack Obama.  Find out more about Barackâ€™s and Hillary Clintons positions at:

Barack Obama:  http://www.barackobama.com/issues/

Hillary Clinton:  http://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/

With respect to all,
David Pippin, Santa Rosa, CA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone can beat Hillary!</p>
<p>I support Barack Obama for reasons extending beyond â€œexperienceâ€ and beyond â€œidealismâ€ and beyond the minutiae details regarding whether a program will work exactly as intended.  </p>
<p>Yes, we need someone capable, but this man has gone up against the establishment time and time again and has succeeded.  Who among us even thought he had a minimul chance of getting to the point he has gotten too against Senator Hillary Clinton?  Yes, we may have hoped he would get this far, but would anyone have guessed his success?  Certainly, the Clintons did not.  The inevitable candidate is not so inevitable, and that just canâ€™t happen.  Or can it?</p>
<p>Barack Obama has surrounded himself with smart people.  He has faced a political machine that has been 20+ years in the making.  Senator Obama has made effective decisions that have placed him within reach of the â€œclear frontrunner.â€  He has put together an organization and a machine that is effective beyond anyoneâ€™s imagination.  â€œLack of experienceâ€ is an extremely weak argument; but it is the Clintons strongest argument.  I suggest that there is a hole in this bucket.</p>
<p>A president is not a â€œmanager.â€  He/She is a leader.  The President is someone who inspires people and a nation to be better, to do better, and knows how to motivate those around him/her to give 100% all the time. A President is someone who can get the job done utilizing the talent around him/her and knows when he/she is out of their comfort zone and range of ability and not afraid to say so.  At the same time smart enough to know how to get the best minds possible on the problem, and from different perspectives, and then helping them, help him, make the best possible decisions.  Nobodyâ€¦ and I mean nobody, has all the answers.  So who would you think has the courage, the conviction, the humility to accept that he/she does not know all the answers, but will strive diligently to find those who do?  If your response is Hillary I would respectfully suggest that you are not being honest with yourself.  If she were capable of that, I would not be here, writing this missive and President Clinton II would be well on her way to the Whitehouse.</p>
<p>Hillary canâ€™t motivate half the democratic party, let alone independents and moderate republicans.  In all candor I would vote for John McCain or Mike Huckabee before casting a vote for Senator Clinton, not out of spite but because I believe in my heart that these gentlemen represent the change I am looking for much more than Hillary Clinton.</p>
<p>If you look, point by point on the issuesâ€¦ the difference between Barack and Hillary are non-existent, I lean towards Barack relative to the ability to get this stuff done, but I respect those who feel Hillary is just as capable.  So Iâ€™m left with deciding based upon who inspires me, who makes me want to do more, who makes me and my country want to be more.  Who thinks in terms of â€œhow do we do this?â€ not â€œcan we do this?â€  </p>
<p>From my chair Hillary sells us, we Americans short.  She says HOPE is not enough.  Hope is NOT enough, but it is an essential, critical first ingredient and without itâ€¦the  cake will never rise.</p>
<p>Please consider voting for Barack Obama.  Find out more about Barackâ€™s and Hillary Clintons positions at:</p>
<p>Barack Obama:  <a href="http://www.barackobama.com/issues/" rel="nofollow">http://www.barackobama.com/issues/</a></p>
<p>Hillary Clinton:  <a href="http://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/" rel="nofollow">http://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/</a></p>
<p>With respect to all,<br />
David Pippin, Santa Rosa, CA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

